HADES and FRS tests, July 10-13, 2018

(return)

Files from 2012 HADES Au+Au beam time:

IBHS

ParaModi/TRIM

MIRKO

HS-197AU-120417-1235-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120417-1235-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120417-1235-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120418-0615-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120418-0615-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120418-0615-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120419-0553-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120419-0553-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120419-0553-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120424-0648-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120424-0648-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120424-0648-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120426-1709-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120426-1709-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120426-1709-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120427-2246-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120427-2246-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120427-2246-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120428-1405-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120428-1405-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120428-1405-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

HS-197AU-120501-1412-SI-TH-HAD.DAT

HS-197AU-120501-1412-SI-TH-HAD.txt

HS-197AU-120501-1412-SI-TH-HAD.MAK

The distribution of themean quadrupole strengths along the beamline is shown below:

HADES_2012_quad_strength.png

The variation of the quadrupole strength over these settings is visulaised below:

HADES_2012_quad_strength_variation.png

Clearly the GHADQD32 and GHADQD52 were most played with, however the strength of GHADQD32 is very small, and in both cases the large variation comes from one change of the, value, at the beginning of the beamtime.

Similar analysis for correctors shows that GHADKX1, GHADKY2, GHADKY3 and GHADKY4 were mostly used:

HADES_2012_corr_strength.png

HADES_2012_corr_strength_variation.png

Also GHADMU2 was varied over time, while GHADMU1 was constant:

HADES_2012_dipoles.png

These changes lead to only negligible variation of the optics. Below the beta function of all optics are overlapped:

hades2012_betx.png hades2012_bety.png

The beta functions of target are about 16.39 meters in horizontal plane and 1.3 meters in vertical.


2020-06-17 16:00